|

let us chose between opportunist and visionary

In our practical life, some people are visionaries, while others are opportunists. Which one are you. Visionary people are risk takers as these types of people attempts all efforts based on ethical principles. Visionaries are creative people that take the initiative with the appropriate action.

Visionaries take intelligent risks that capitalize on prime conditions. This kind of leader starts small by taking measured steps than later bigger risks. Visionary people are also strategic planner. Visionary leaders are strategic planners. Like a chess player, these leaders plan ahead to make the best business moves. Strategic planning involves creating an action plan with a particular strategy in mind. The leader’s vision defines what the organization will look like in the future and how it will function. His strategies are designed to take him toward his ultimate vision.

Visionary people inspire others because they are inspired themselves. They are excited about the possibility of creating an exciting future for themselves. They get up every morning and they see every effort they make as part of a great plan to accomplish something wonderful with their lives. Visionary people are optimistic. They see opportunities in everything that happens, positive or negative. They look for the good in every situation and in every person. They seek the valuable lessons contained in every problem or setback.

They never experience “failures;” instead, they write them off as “learning experiences. Visionary people have a sense of meaning and purpose in each area of their lives. They have clear, written goals and plans they work on every day. Visionary people are clear about where they are going and what they will have to do to get there. Their behaviour is purposeful and goal-directed. As a result, they accomplish five and ten times as much as the average person who operates from day to day with little concern about the future. Visionary people accept personal responsibility.  Visionary people are action-oriented. They are constantly in motion. They try something, and then something else, and then something else again. They never give up. Visionary people have integrity. They tell the truth at all times.

They live in truth with themselves, and they live in truth with others. Being a visionary person is a great responsibility. It is both scary and exhilarating. Once you decide to become a leader in your life, you cast off the shackles of fear and dependency that hold most people back. With your own hands, you design your own future. You set yourself fully on the path to becoming everything you are capable of becoming. If you’re always seeking opportunities without a vision, then that is called selfishness. An opportunist feels the temptation to take all opportunities that come their way. Opportunists see the current opportunity as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, while visionaries know that there are many once-in-a-lifetime opportunities. A visionary is confident that their vision won’t be hindered by masquerading opportunities that will inevitably take them off course. Essentially, a visionary is able to differentiate between the opportunities that benefit the vision and those that detour it. Opportunists are often lost when an opportunity is fulfilled and motivated by new opportunity rather than confidence in a solid direction. Visionary’ is a a buzz word and if you’re like me, you probably thought a visionary was someone that changes the world. It can be, but it doesn’t have to be.

 

 

 

Opportunism is the conscious policy and practice of taking selfish advantage of circumstances with little regard for principles, or with what the consequences are for others. Opportunist actions are expedient actions guided primarily by self-interested motives. This is a bad ethics practiced by certain individual humans and living organisms, groups, organizations, styles, behaviours, and trends. Opportunism is sometimes also defined as the ability to capitalize on the mistakes of others: to utilize opportunities created by the errors, weaknesses or distractions of opponents to one’s own advantage. Opportunists are people who see a chance to gain some advantage from a situation, often at the expense of ethics or morals. An opportunist seizes every opportunity to improve things for himself.

Opportunist is a person who starts taking bath if he accidentally falls into a river. A lot of people classify “opportunists particularly in the workplace – as manipulative, and it brings with it many negative connotations. Opportunism is the most misunderstand yet highest-impact approach to decision-making. Opportunism is “the practice of looking for and using opportunities to gain an advantage for oneself, without considering if this is fair or right.Taking realistic or practical approach to a problem can involve “weak” forms of opportunism. For the sake of doing something that will work, or that successfully solves the problem, a previously agreed principle is knowingly compromised or disregarded – with the justification that alternative actions would, overall, have a worse effect. In choosing or seizing opportunities, human opportunism is most likely to occur where: People can make the most gains for themselves at the least cost to themselves. Relevant internal or external controls on their behaviour are absent. People are pressured to choose and act. Criticism of opportunism usually refers to a situation where beliefs and principles are tested or challenged.

Human opportunism should not be confused with “seeking opportunities” as such, or “making use of opportunities when they arise”. Opportunism refers rather to a specific way of responding to opportunities, which involves the element of self-interestedness plus disregard for relevant (ethical) principles, or for intended or previously agreed goals, or for the shared concerns of a group. As a style of human behaviour, opportunism has the connotation of a lack of integrity or doing something that is out of character (inconsistent). The underlying thought is that the price of the unrestrained pursuit of selfishness is behavioural inconsistency.

Thus, opportunism involves compromising some or other principle normally upheld. However, the boundary between legitimate self-interest and “undesirable or anti-social selfishness” can be difficult to define; the definition may depend on one’s point of view, or position in life. Some people regard an opportunist stance positively as a legitimate choice, which can be the lesser evil. Life can be viewed as presenting “an endless series of opportunities”, where the pattern of one’s responses defines who or what one is (individual identity). It can also be viewed as a striving to realize or express certain principles. However, the moral dilemma implied by opportunism concerns the conflict of self-interest with the interests of others, or with following a principle: either to do what one wants, or to do “what is the right thing to do”. Thus, substantively, opportunism refers to someone who acts on opportunities in a self.

In human behaviour generally, opportunism concerns the relationship between what people do, and their basic principles when faced with opportunities and challenges. The opportunist seeks to gain personal advantage when an opportunity presents itself, putting self-interest ahead of some other interest, in a way contrary either to a previously established principle or another principle that ought to have higher priority. Hence opportunist behaviour is usually regarded at least as questionable or dubious, and at most as unjustifiable or completely illegitimate. Opportunism is regarded as unhealthy, as a disorder or as a character deficiency, if selfishly pursuing an opportunity is blatantly anti-social which involves disregard for the needs, wishes and interests of others. However, behaviour can also be regarded as “opportunist by scholars without any particular moral evaluation being made or implied (simply as a type of self-interested behaviour).few examples of opportunism  are the following: Refuse to take a risk, if doing so would reduce influence, support, wealth or popularity, even although taking the risk is consistent with the principles the person or group uphold.Somali-land politicians who shift from one political party to another one is most unpleasant opportunist

 

 

Take a risk for the purpose of gaining maintaining influence, support, wealth or popularity, although taking this risk is inconsistent with the principles being espoused. Take advantage of an opportunity to increase influence, support, wealth or popularity, although it is not consistent with the principles being upheld. Refuse to respond to an opportunity, only because responding to it might forfeit influence, support, wealth or popularity, even although taking the opportunity would in truth be consistent with the principles being subscribed to. Thus, the opportunity exploited for selfish ends can itself exist either because an action is taken, or because of deliberate inaction (when action should really have been taken.

The propensity to engage in such kinds of behaviours depends a great deal on the presence of absence of personal characteristics such as integrity, moral character personal insight or self awareness personal flexibility and balances. It also depends on the ability to judge the consequences of different courses of action correctly. Strong emotions and desire may also play a role, and much may depend on how permissive a person,. These factors influence the capacity to know “where to draw the line” appropriately, and regulate one’s own behaviour so that it remains consistent. Personalities and beliefs are shaped by the specific environment where they form. It is likely that the possibilities for opportunist behaviour are promoted in contexts where there is not only an incentive to engage in them, but also where it is also extremely difficult for some reason to remain behaviourally consistent, or where ordinary constraints on behaviour are lacking.

In that case, opportunist behaviour does not seem to have much adverse effect or consequence, at least in the short term, compared to the much greater benefits of engaging in it. Eight main contexts are referred to in the literature: the service. Professionals may, to a great extent, make their own judgements, interpretations, and decisions about the exact approach to take—without an explicit rule that they must perform in a specific way. Such a situation can be exploited with opportunist motives that are contrary to the stated ethics of a profession. Consequently, it becomes necessary—for the sake of preserving professional integrity—to explicate “guiding norms” that define the boundaries of acceptable practice, or to divide up roles in such a way that different people in an organization can effectively check and control what their colleagues actually do (to keep them honest. 

Intellectual opportunism the pursuit of intellectual opportunities with a selfish, concealed motive not consistent with relevant principles refers to certain self-serving tendencies of the human intellect, often involving professional producers and disseminators of ideas, who work with idea-formation all the time. The phenomenon of intellectual opportunism is frequently associated by its critics with careerism. When human knowledge becomes a trade able good in a market of ideas, all sorts of opportunities arise for huckstering, swindling, haggling and hustling with information in ways which are regarded as unprincipled, dubious or involve deceit of some sort. In conclusion.  In the final analysis, you are the leader of your own life. You are the general in command of your own personal army. You are the president of your own personal services corporation. You are the “Captain of your fate and the master of your soul..” I’m not sure moral rationale should be part of the definition, and therefore it can be simplified as “An opportunist is someone that finds and takes advantage of opportunities and finally does this article sound to you any valuable interest, as  I am sure every of us experienced personalies classified either one of the two qualities qualities.   

 

 

Ismail Yusuf.

Rabassoro55@hotmail.co.uk

Comments are closed